The ADD has been accepted by our client and therefore its version has been raised to 1.0.
The ATP has been accepted by our client and therefore its version has been raised to 1.0.
The DDD has been accepted by our technical advisor and therefore its version has been raised to 1.0.
The ITP has been accepted by our technical advisor and therefore its version has been set to 1.0.
We did a lot of internal reviews and got a lot of external reviews, that are all bundled into one document. The version numbering here is more on-the-fly than for other documents, for obvious reasons: we did not review the reviews. Thus, there were no real milestones where the version could be increased. This document has not been "accepted" by the customer or managers, but of course the reviews have been processed and thus the results have been accepted indirectly.
The SCMP has been accepted by our management and therefore its version has been raised to 1.0.
The SPMP has been created by our managers and therefore it has a slightly different layout and versioning.
The SQAP has been created by our managers and therefore it has a slightly different layout and versioning.
The SRD has been accepted by our client and therefore its version has been raised to 2.0.
The STD has been accepted by our technical advisor and therefore its version has been set to 1.0.
The SUM has been accepted by our client and therefore its version has been set to 1.0.
The SVVP has been accepted by our management and therefore its version has been set to 1.0.
The URD has been accepted by our client on 8 may 2013 and therefore its version has been raised to 1.0.
The UTP has been accepted by our technical advisor and therefore its version has been set to 1.0.
Currently, we have finished the project. The final version after 5 sprints was version 1.0, but after that, we changed some things in response to remarks from the client during the acceptance test. After that, the code was marked version 1.1.